Rive News
Tech

AI disproves 27-year computer science rule, labs claim

Tech

Two AI labs, one giant claim

OpenAI and Anthropic both say their AI disproved a 27-year-old computer science rule.

Explainer

What is the rule?

The exponential time hypothesis says some logic puzzles have no real shortcut.

Explainer

Think of a password

Every new character multiplies the guesses. That is exponential time.

Background

A rule from 1999

Impagliazzo, Paturi and Zane proposed it. Hundreds of papers built on it.

OpenAI

OpenAI's claim

Its model found the disproof on October 16. A machine checked it on October 17.

Anthropic

Anthropic's claim

A Claude model found the idea on October 16 too, with no human help.

Caveat

Only theory, for now

The new method only beats brute force past 10 billion variables. Useless in practice.

Caveat

Not reviewed yet

No peer review. No human has fully checked either proof yet.

Next

The rule makers lead the review

The scientists who created the rule are now checking whether it really fell.

Reaction

Researchers react

One professor says 50 of his papers may be pointless. He calls it cool and terrible.

Why it matters

Your passwords are safe

OpenAI checked: the new method does not break internet security.

Rive News

Read the full explainer

What the proofs say, what is verified, and what happens next.

Tech

Read the full story

Get the full breakdown, key numbers, and what happens next.

Read on Rive News
Read the full story